Licensed to be confusing, restrictive and obtuse

25 April 2008
1 minute read
ITAM News & Analysis

Licensed to be confusing, restrictive and obtuse

25 April 2008
1 minute read

“Most of us never read software licences, but they are becoming more important – and absurd.”

“Eulas typically specify that the software’s publisher is not liable if anything goes wrong. They typically specify the publisher’s preferred jurisdiction for legal disputes. And some are even more restrictive: some graphics packages have been known to specify that they cannot be used in the production of pornographic images. Yet these licences are, as Hanlon complained, not really contracts: you generally cannot read them before you buy (rather than use) the software, and you can’t negotiate terms.”
An interesting article in the Guardian yesterday on software licensing. Read the full article here.

About Martin Thompson

Martin is the founder of ITAM Forum, a not-for-profit trade body for the advancement of IT Asset Management.

He is also the author of the book "Practical ITAM - The essential guide for IT Asset Managers", a book that describes how to get started and make a difference in the field of IT Asset Management. In addition, Martin developed the PITAM training course and certification.

Connect with Martin on LinkedIn.

Can’t find what you’re looking for?