It has been suggested that Oracle derives 50% of Oracle database revenue in the UK from audit activity and the Campaign for Clear Licensing has reported that “92% of customers say that Oracle does not clearly communicate licensing changes”.
Maybe you’ve grown bored of propping up Oracle’s flagging database business? maybe you are irritated by the continual threat of audit? Maybe it’s time to consider alternatives?
Tibero don’t audit customers, have a straightforward licensing program with no boobytraps, and is said to cost 50% cheaper than Oracle. So, technology challenges aside (discussed below), what a refreshing alternative.
Those seeking alternatives might also like to take a look at these lists:
“There are a few different options. If you want to stick with similar, relational database technologies then the alternatives are Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL or PostgreSQL.
If you want to look at distributed storage and processing, then there are new technology options under the banner of NoSQL – this is a family of databases that are designed to work in different, workload-specific, ways. They come from problems faced by the likes of Google and Facebook – these companies developed the technologies to handle their data management issues, then open sourced the technologies.
Apache Cassandra is a good example – it was originally developed at Facebook, then became part of the Apache Software Foundation. Cassandra is now used by companies including Netflix, eBay and SONY to power their online business and massive scaling needs. Cassandra has tended to be used by web companies that need an always-on, highly scaling database. In some cases even across multiple data centers.
Cassandra can and has been used to replace Oracle DB instances in retail, finance / banking and telco services.
From a licensing perspective, open source technologies come in at around ten percent of the cost of a comparable Oracle license. This is a significant TCO advantage when looking at the speed and size of data needed to be competitive.”
Part of Oracle’s enduring stickiness is it’s ownership of the stack of technology around the database. Can we rip out Oracle and replace it with something else? or shall we keep taking the abuse and grin and bear it? This is a point Oracle and other software dinosaurs will labour during pitches and negotiations, pouring fresh ladles of FUD on alternatives.
From an ITAM and procurement viewpoint, there are three major technology and political hurdles to address:
IT Asset Management professionals can play an instrumental role in finding alternatives and scoping out the transition (and shedding a great deal of risk, headaches and anguish from an aggressive vendor in the process).
“At a high level, there are three stages to making the transition:
Have you a success story from moving from Oracle to share? What alternatives would you recommend? Please leave a comment below or contact me using the details below. Thanks, Martin