Is SAP indirect access hindering IoT innovation?
The ITAM Review invites readers to join a new Special Interest Group (SIG) dedicated to SAP licensing, in particular SAP Indirect Access.
SAP Indirect access remains a cash cow for SAP during audits due to unclear terms and the growing nature of Internet connected devices and systems. SAP customers complain that SAP licensing is not keeping up with innovation.
Indirect access is whereby technology is accessing SAP infrastructure indirectly and SAP make a claim for use of their IP. For example you might develop a new shiny mobile app for your customers that might interrogate SAP infrastructure when a customer query is made on the new mobile app, because SAP contracts are ‘archaic’ no such terms exist for handling this new type of access and SAP are said to be exploiting this greyness during negotiations.
In the brave new world of mobility and IoT connected devices, SAP indirect access remains a risk for the ITAM department and constraint for technology innovators.
The Chatham house rule applies to SIG calls to encourage openness and the sharing of information:
“When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.” Source
Thanks, Martin
(Sorry, registration now closed & over subscribed)